When Contracts Get Cancelled and Borders Get Closed

SOLE-SOURCE SCANDALS AND SUPPLIER SHUTOUTS

This week brought dramatic reminders that procurement isn't just about the lowest bidder—it's about politics, perception, and increasingly, passport origins. From British Columbia's embarrassing contract cancellation to Manitoba's border wall for bidders, the message is clear: the rules of government contracting are changing fast.

B.C. PREMIER PULLS THE PLUG ON $325K CONSULTING CONTRACT

Source: Global News

What Happened: Premier David Eby terminated a controversial $325,000 sole-source consulting contract with former Ontario cabinet minister Michael Bryant after just six months. The contract was meant to develop a "framework" for Vancouver's Downtown Eastside services, but instead became a political liability when critics accused the government of favouritism.

Bryant had been quietly awarded the contract without public disclosure—because nothing says "transparent government" quite like hiring your buddy to solve homelessness without telling anyone. Opposition members noted that "no reporting benchmarks have been disclosed or met," which in consultant-speak translates to "we paid someone $75,000 to think really hard about stuff."

The Numbers:

• Contract value: Up to $325,000

• Amount paid before termination: ~$75,000

• Duration: 6 months (ended May 18, 2025)

• Public disclosure: None until media caught wind

Our Take: Maybe I am jaded from living in Ontario, where our ministers call on governments to give billion dollar contracts to certain vendors, or the recent Health scandal in Alberta, but this seems pretty tame. It is less an example of corruption, and more an example of bad political maneuvering, especially when it has a price tag of only $325K. You’d think Eby would have more game.

What This Means for Contractors:

• Sole-source contracts face increased scrutiny and potential cancellation regardless of legal validity, especially after Alberta

• Lack of clear deliverables and benchmarks can doom even legitimate projects

• Expect stricter reporting requirements and public disclosure going forward

• Proactively embrace transparency rather than hide behind confidentiality clauses

MANITOBA SLAMS THE DOOR ON U.S. BIDDERS

Source: Global News

What Happened: Manitoba formally implemented its "Buy Canadian" procurement policy, explicitly barring U.S. companies from certain provincial contracts as retaliation against American tariffs. Recent RFPs now include blunt language: "submissions which propose the use of subcontractors based in the United States will be automatically disqualified." This is potentially the harshest Buy Canadian procurement policy we have seen.

The policy targets contracts below trade agreement thresholds, allowing Manitoba to prefer Canadian businesses without violating international agreements. It's like building a fence around your sandbox—technically legal, definitely petty.

The Contradiction: Here's where it gets spicy: despite banning Americans from park washroom contracts, Manitoba awarded at least two deals worth over $1.8 million each to U.S.-headquartered tech firms after tariffs took effect. One contract with Texas-based Actian was even sole-sourced, proving that principles are flexible when you need specialized software.

Opposition critics had a field day: "This NDP government gave multimillion-dollar contracts to American firms in the middle of a trade war." This was, however, just another example of the politicization of procurement. Government procurement takes so long that the Actian deal like came together a year ago. Choosing to cancel it would only hurt the government and taxpayers.

Our Take: Manitoba's approach reveals the messy reality of protectionist procurement. It's easy to ban Americans from building outhouses, much harder to find Canadian alternatives for enterprise software. The government's defence that they're "reviewing policies" suggests more changes are coming.

What This Means for Contractors:

• Canadian suppliers gain immediate competitive advantage on sub-threshold contracts

• Contract sizing becomes strategic—expect bundling or splitting to include/exclude competitors

• U.S. companies need Canadian partners or subsidiaries to remain competitive

• Document your supply chain's Canadian content thoroughly—maple leaf certificates might become the new currency

INDIGENOUS PROCUREMENT UNDER FIRE

Source: Global News

What Happened: The Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council filed a human rights complaint alleging "Indigenous identity fraud by 'pretendians'" is undermining the $1.6 billion Procurement Strategy for Indigenous Business (PSIB). They're calling out the verification system for being about as rigorous as airport security in the 1990s.

The complaint centres on allegations that non-Indigenous companies used Indigenous figureheads or shell companies to access contracts meant for legitimate Indigenous businesses. The Tribal Council argues this represents "the next stage of colonization"—because apparently, some people thought regular colonization didn't go far enough.

The Stakes:

• PSIB allocates 5% of federal contracts ($1.6 billion annually) to Indigenous businesses

• Self-attestation system used until 2022 enabled systematic fraud

• Auditor General investigation underway, results expected fall 2026

• Verification now requires 51% Indigenous ownership and control

Our Take: The "pretendian" problem was an open secret that's finally getting official attention. The self-attestation system was like asking people to pinky-promise they're telling the truth about billion-dollar contracts—noble in theory, problematic in practice.

What This Means for Contractors:

• Expect significant changes to Indigenous procurement verification processes

• Legitimate Indigenous businesses should prepare for enhanced documentation requirements

• Non-Indigenous firms need to carefully review partnership structures for compliance

• The days of loosely structured Indigenous partnerships are ending—expect detailed scrutiny

YOUR WEEKLY PROCUREMENT ACTION PLAN

Based on this week's chaos, contractors should:

1. Embrace Radical Transparency

• Document deliverables, benchmarks, and progress clearly

• Consider proactively publishing contract summaries

• The era of "trust us" contracting is over—get ahead of transparency demands

2. Audit Your Supply Chain Geography

• Document Canadian content thoroughly

• Consider restructuring supplier relationships to emphasize domestic partnerships

• Prepare for protectionist policies to spread beyond Manitoba

3. Strengthen Indigenous Partnership Compliance

• Review ownership structures and control mechanisms carefully

• Prepare for enhanced verification requirements

• The crackdown is coming—get compliant now

4. Monitor Contract Structuring

• Understand how thresholds affect eligibility and competition

• Expect governments to use contract sizing strategically

• Position for both bundled and split procurement opportunities

5. Prepare for the New Normal The combination of transparency demands, protectionist policies, and enhanced verification represents a fundamental shift. Companies that adapt quickly will gain advantage over those clinging to old practices.

Publicus helps Canada’s government contractors find, qualify, and win more government contracts while saving them the headache of navigating procurement.